Stephen Wood KC
Head of Chambers - Call: 1991 | Silk: 2020
Stephen Wood KC
Qualifications: LL.B.(Hons)
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Stephen Wood KC is renowned for his expertise in the prosecution and defence of cases involving homicide and organised crime.
Prior to his appointment to Silk in 2020, Stephen was widely acknowledged as being one of the foremost juniors on Circuit. He excels as a trial advocate and is a formidable cross-examiner.
Stephen possesses excellent judgment married with an acute tactical awareness for all stages of the prosecution process.
Stephen’s encyclopaedic knowledge of criminal law, the sentencing provisions and of the Criminal Procedure Rules is acknowledged by other legal professionals and the judiciary; one Judge remarking that Stephen was a “..walking talking Archbold”. Accordingly, Stephen acts in an advisory capacity pre-charge in cases involving prosecutions where there is a novel issue of law.
Stephen’s practice now encompasses all aspects of serious and organised crime and the most serious cases of sexual offending. Described by a High Court Judge as a “first rate prosecutor”, Stephen is dedicated and hard-working and instils great confidence in those who work with him.
Stephen also works with screenplay writers and directors on television and film productions depicting court scenes. He was with the director on set during filming of the Crown Court scenes in the acclaimed Channel 4 series ‘National Treasure’ and advised the writer and director of the Netflix Drama “I Came By”.
Reputation
"Stephen has a 'hands-on' style and is always willing to advise”.
"Stephen is always well prepared and approachable and has offered a high level of service ”.
"Stephen Wood KC is ‘well-prepared and courageous in court’ and ‘devastating in cross-examination’, with an established track record in prosecuting and defending in a wide range of serious criminal matters”.
"Stephen is a fearless cross-examiner and his jury speeches are perfectly pitched. He is a good operator, tactically astute. Juries love him”.
"Stephen Wood KC is a well-regarded practitioner with experience on both the prosecution and defence sides of criminal proceedings. He has experience handling serious criminal cases including murder and sexual offences. He is a Grade 4 prosecutor who appears in the Crown Court and the Court of Appeal”.
"He is a fluent advocate and has great ability at enabling juries to understand complex issues. A tactically astute silk who is great with clients”.
"He prosecutes serious cases extremely effectively in a calm, understated, and fair-minded way. He is highly organised. His cross examinations are focused, and to the point. He stands his ground with judges and is good at maintaining his case strategy. He is engaging with juries. He obviously commands the respect of those who instruct him and his opponents”.
"Stephen Wood has an extensive criminal defence practice”.
"Highly rated for serious crime defence”.
"Stephen Wood is ‘good with difficult clients’ with experience in fraud and conspiracy”.
"An excellent choice for heavy crime”.
" “Very Good with difficult clients… Well followed as a serious crime defender”.
" Always has an ace up his sleeve when defending heavy crime”.
Expertise
Crime
Stephen is instructed in an advisory capacity and for advocacy in all aspects of serious crime and including offences with novel points of law. His experience includes:
• Child sexual exploitation and trafficking;
• Serious drug offences;
• Firearm offences
• Organised crime;
• Murder and manslaughter;
• Terrorism.
Stephen prosecutes and defends at every stage of the criminal process, from pre-charge advice for prosecuting authorities and individuals and companies subject to investigation, to representation at trial and at any appeal.
Stephen is also instructed to advise upon and conduct cases before the Administrative Court and appellate courts concerning judicial review of matters relating to criminal law.
Stephen also acts as an advocacy trainer.
Regulatory
Stephen’s proven track record and his criminal law pedigree lends itself well to his prosecution and defence of professionals before their own professional disciplinary tribunals. Instructed by individuals, regulatory bodies and defence organisations, he acts in sensitive cases, particularly those involving tandem criminal and disciplinary issues, and especially those concerning professionals who have allegedly engaged in sexual misconduct or those with substance misuse or mental health problems or those cases where serious alleged failings have resulted in death or very serious, permanent damage.
Allied with this, Stephen is adept at advising upon and conducting Judicial Review proceedings where there have been alleged failures in procedural propriety within disciplinary proceedings or in quasi-criminal cases relating to prosecutorial decisions. For example, he acted for the Crown Prosecution Service in the leading case of R (on the application of A) v Crown Prosecution Service & South Yorkshire Police in relation to the decision making process for ‘diversion from prosecution’ of youths in cases of serious knife crime.
Stephen’s astute tactical awareness for all stages of the criminal process has lead to him being instructed by Company Directors and Companies pre-charge, to advise in relation to contemplated prosecutions by the Health & Safety Executive, where there has been a death.
That same vast experience of the criminal jurisdiction and his ability to concentrate on key issues and deploy effective cross-examination enables Stephen to have a unique insight when representing the families of the bereaved or police officers before the Coroner’s Court where there has been a death in custody or a death caused by shooting by police firearms officers.
Notable Cases
R v Warren Spence (2025) - Leeds Crown Court
Prosecuted Warren Spence, leading Matthew Harding of PSQB, who was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 24 years, for a brutal and sustained attack upon his partner, involving the use of a hammer, bites and repeatedly stamping on her chest causing catastrophic injuries. https://www.itv.com/news/calendar/2025-03-24/life-for-killer-whose-partner-predicted-her-own-murder
R v Steven Francis (2025) - Leeds Crown Court
Stephen Wood KC leading Abigail Langford were instructed by Yorkshire and Humberside CPS to prosecute Francis for the brutal murder of a woman and the rapes of a further woman. The defendant was convicted of all counts and was sentenced to life imprisonment and ordered to serve a minimum term of 28 years. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3rwprlx7e8o
R v Leon Smith (2024) - Hull Crown Court
Murder Acquittal. Following a trial that lasted approximately 4 weeks, Stephen Wood KC and his Junior Charlotte Baines of Wilberforce Chambers Hull, secured an acquittal for their client Leon Smith. Mr Smith was found not guilty of both murder and the alternative manslaughter. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hull-east-yorkshire-news/young-man-cleared-over-death-9765037
R v Jason Gowen (2024) - Preston Crown Court
Stephen Wood KC prosecuted Gowen who strangled and smothered a mother-of-two to death after already being on bail for attacking another woman. Gowen received a life sentence with a minimum term of 20 years. News Coverage: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12973425/Abusive-boyfriend-28-strangled-smothered-mother-two-37-death-bail-attacking-woman-killer-faces-life-jail.html
R v Anon (2024) - Leeds Crown Court
Stephen led Abigail Langford prosecuted two teenagers for hacking to death Harley Brown, using machetes. News Coverage: https://news.sky.com/story/harley-browns-killers-sentenced-to-life-for-stabbing-him-to-death-after- chance-meeting-outside-huddersfield-shop-13033725
R v Mark Vaskouski (2024) - Hull Crown Court
Defendant convicted of murder having assaulted victim and left him in a flat which was already on fire causing death. News Coverage: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ced1p527v61o
R v Feve, Wattam and ors (2023) - Hull Crown Court
Led Clare Walsh and successfully prosecuted defendants for Murder, Manslaughter and Perverting the Course of Justice. News coverage: https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/news/grimsby-news/kian-feve-guilty-murdering-jack-8960407 and https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2e20rv7g22o
Rex v Moyo, Gill and Rehman (2023)- Sheffield Crown Court
Instructed by Yorkshire and Humberside Complex CPS Complex Casework Unit, this was the first case to be prosecuted in the United Kingdom involving the production of functioning sub-machine guns using a 3D printer. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-64900210
R v X (2023)- Bradford Crown Court
Defending mother for attempted murder of very young child.
R v Selmani & Senia (2023)- Sheffield Crown Court
Instructed to prosecute in the retrial for the manslaughter of Armend Xhika. Selmani was sentenced to 20 years and Senia 13 years and four months. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-67168728
R v Jabari Fanty and Others (2022)
Sheffield Crown Court, Prosecution, Obtained convictions after trial of all Defendants on all counts for murder, attempted murder, conspiracy to possess modified firearms and ammunition with intent to endanger life, and conspiracy to supply controlled drugs of Class A. One of the most complex cases to be investigated by South Yorkshire Police. Instructed by Yorkshire and Humberside Complex Casework Unit. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-61986797
R v Butt (2021)- Leeds Crown Court
Prosecution: Killing using motor car as weapon
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-56860006
And before the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/crime/sadistic-leeds-murderer-loses-appeal-to-have-his-28-year-sentence-reduced-3547729
R v Taylor Meanley and Others (2021)
Prosecution: Execution of rival gang member using ‘slam gun’.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-59085628
R v Jaspal Marwaha (2021) – Leeds Crown Court
Prosecution: Advising on charge and prosecuting first prosecution of its kind involving ‘Airbow’ weapon and verdict establishing weapon was ‘firearm’ withing meaning of Firearms Act 1968
https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/crime/an-utterly-lethal-weapon-how-leeds-jurors-made-landmark-legal-ruling-on-the-deadly-airbow-3445912
R v Mottershead and Others (2021) – Sheffield Crown Court
Prosecution: Gangland shooting
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-55591197
R v X (2020)– Bradford Crown Court
Prosecution: Mother suffocating children.
https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/18800526.bradford-mum-tried-strangle-poison-young-sons-given-indefinite-hospital-order/
R v Lloyd Birkby (2020) – Bradford Crown Court
Defence: Death caused by throwing mobile phone at victim.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-52215975
R v Paul Crowther (2020) – Leeds Crown Court
Defence: Killing by Defendant who heard voices commanding him.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-54077848
R v Stephen Dunford & Others (2020) – Sheffield Crown Court
Prosecution: Series of gangland related shootings, culminating in shooting of 12 year old boy.
https://www.thestar.co.uk/news/crime/live-updates-sheffield-gangster-stephen-dunford-given-life-imprisonment-over-attempted-murder-12-year-old-boy-drive-shooting-2995445
R v Sharples (2020) – Liverpool Crown Court
Defence: Murder by mixed martial artist.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/boozed-up-nutcase-beat-vulnerable-19104180
R v Ian Watkins (2019)– Leeds Crown Court
Prosecution: Offences committed by former lead singer of The LostProphets in prison.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-49294092
R v Crossland (2019) – York Crown Court
Prosecution: Largest ever haul of IIOC in North Yorkshire and Firearms offences.
https://www.itv.com/news/2019-03-11/pensioner-jailed-over-one-of-largest-hauls-of-indecent-images-found-in-england
R v John Taylor (2018) – Leeds Crown Court
Prosecution: Cold case review of serious sexual offences committed by Defendant already serving life for murder.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-45990773
R v Neil Taggart – Leeds Crown Court
Defence of former Lord Mayor of Leeds
https://www.itv.com/news/calendar/2017-07-04/disgraced-former-lord-mayor-jailed-for-sex-offences
Clerks
Michelle Colborne KC
Call: 1993 | Silk: 2010
Michelle Colborne KC
LL.B (Hons), University of Wales
North Eastern Circuit
Gray’s Inn
Contact
T: 01274 722 560
Michelle was called to the Bar in 1993 and took Silk in 2010. Michelle is one of the leading criminal practitioners on the North Eastern Circuit for the prosecution and defence and has particular specialisms in homicide, baby death and serious sexual offences.
Michelle has a particular interest in representing vulnerable defendants and those charged with offences committed whilst mentally ill.
Reputation
Michelle presents seminars and has spoken at conferences about Child Sexual Exploitation including a presentation on behalf of Victim Support Northern Ireland to the Irish Judiciary Bar and Probation based on Vulnerable Witnesses and Empowerment.
Michelle is an advocacy trainer for the North Eastern Circuit.
Other notable seminars include the psychology of the criminal mind and the issue of consent.
Michelle is involved in providing guidance and advice on the issues of consent and protection issues to sports clubs seeking to support young players and staff.
Michelle is also an open water swimming coach and established ‘Take the Plunge’, where she hosts open water swimming and mindfulness sessions. She works with Mental Health Swims and hosts monthly swims in the Yorkshire Dales.
Expertise
Crime
Michelle is renowned for her work in the Rotherham Child Sexual Abuse trials; the Prosecution of Alexander Smith (Gangland Murder); the Murder Acquittal of Trevor Isles; Prosecuting one of the First Forced Marriage cases taking place abroad (Bangladesh) under S121 of the Antisocial Behaviour Crime & Policing Act 2014; Prosecution of Frank Cochran for sexual assault and coercive or controlling behaviour and the recent defence of Keegan Barnes (Murder Acquittal and conviction for Manslaughter).
Regulatory
Michelle’s extensive experience in complex criminal homicide and baby shaking cases crosses over into her work in coronial law. She has a wealth of knowledge of medical issues, including serious brain and other suspected non accidental injuries.
Michelle advises and represents families, and professionals at coroner’s inquests. She also advises in relation to complaints to the Care Quality Commission on behalf of elderly and those lacking capacity. Additionally, she has advised victims of child sexual exploitation in relation to actions against the police and local authority, for abuse suffered whilst in care.
Notable cases include judicial review against a police decision not to prosecute a care home for neglect of an elderly patient with dementia; defence of a care home manager in allegations of medical neglect of multiple residents; representation of the family of a deceased teenager at inquest where death had occurred when his car was involved in a collision with a bus.
Currently Michelle is involved in inquests relating to, for example, a death/suicide whilst in the care of the NHS, death in a residential home and a death whilst in the care of a private ambulance company.
Notable Cases
R v A Sheikh and ors (2024, Leeds Crown Court)
Defence - causing or allowing a vulnerable adult to suffer serious physical harm. A Court of Appeal judgement was handed down and convictions against the Sheikhs were overturned. Complex legal issues.
https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/west-yorkshire-news/huddersfield-family-jailed-after-wife-30880298
R v M (2024, Bradford Crown Court)
Defence - defendant was acquitted of the murder of his brother, having admitted killing him during a fight. He was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpq9l358172o.amp
R v Smalley and Leaning (2024, Hull Crown Court)
Successful prosecution of two defendants convicted of murder and manslaughter. Leading Laura McBride
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99xn88pgp2o.amp
R v Ibbitson (2023, Leeds Crown Court)
The prosecution of Ibbitson, leading Abdul Shakoor, for sadistic murder of Jennifer Andrews. Ibbitson was handed a life sentence with a minimum term of 29 years.
https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/leeds-news/obsessed-leeds-killer-rawden-ibbitson-27001199
R v Arif Choudhury (2023, Bradford Crown Court)
Prosecution of Choudhury, leading Peter Hampton (now HHJ Hampton, for serious rape case. Choudhury had previously evaded trial with grooming gang by fleeing to Bangladesh. Defendant received 8 years imprisonment.
https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/west-yorkshire-news/sick-monster-raped-girl-passed-27672717
R v Rehman (2023, Leeds Crown Court)
Defence Counsel in the UK's first prosecution relating to the manufacture of functioning sub-machine guns using a 3D printer. Michelle Colborne KC and Laura McBride defended Majeeb Rehman who was convicted of conspiracy to transfer a prohibited firearm but was cleared of possessing ammunition without a certificate
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-64900210
R v John Woodliff (2022, Leeds Crown Court)
Michelle led Laura McBride in the successful defence of John Woodliff who had been charged fraud alongside former MP Jared O'Mara. Woodliff was found not guilty.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/feb/08/jared-o-mara-former-labour-mp-found-guilty-expenses-fraud
Keegan Barnes (2022, Teesside Crown Court)
Michelle defended Keegan Barnes in an allegation of murder. The jury acquitted the defendant of murder and convicted her of manslaughter by a majority https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/live-killer-keegan-barnes-sentenced-23449684
R v Barbara Coombes (2018, Manchester Crown Square)
Michelle prosecuted Barbara Coombes for the manslaughter of her father 15 years prior to the discovery of the body.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-44794426
R v Hussain & Others (2016, Rotherham Grooming Trial)
Michelle led Peter Hampton and Laura McBride in the prosecution of six people, including three brothers and their uncle who were convicted of the "systematic" sexual abuse of teenage girls in Rotherham.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-35651366
R v H (2012, Bradford Crown Court)
This case was the successful defence of a transgender individual who was subject to allegations of historic and recent sexual abuse. The Defendant and witnesses had special educational needs and intermediaries were required throughout the trial. In addition the case involved careful, sensitive cross-examination of a child who was a self-elect mute.
R v Lindo (2011, Bradford Crown Court)
Michelle Colborne QC (leading Nigel Hamilton) acted as leading counsel for the prosecution where the major issue was loss of control. The Defendant had brutally killed his partner, the mother of his children, storing her body in a suitcase for 2 months whilst assuming her identity via Facebook and telephone contact. The Defendant was convicted of murder.
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/crime/teacher-declines-take-stand-body-suitcase-murder-trial-1921542
COURT OF APPEAL R v Carey and others [2006] EWCA Crim 17
This appeal is the leading case in Unlawful Act Manslaughter. Michelle represented a teenage Defendant in the Crown Court and before the Court of Appeal charged with manslaughter of another teenage girl who had an undiagnosed heart defect. The case limits the use by the Prosecution of the offence of affray as the “unlawful and dangerous act” in manslaughter cases.
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2006/17.html
Clerks
Rodney Ferm
Call: 1972
Rodney Ferm
North Eastern Circuit
B.A. (Oxon)
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Rodney Ferm specialises in criminal law and is a respected presence in the Crown Court. His experience extends not only to defending serious fraud and sexual offences, including indecency and rape, but to over 100 murder cases. Rodney can be relied upon to provide an outstanding advocacy service in very difficult circumstances. Celebrating his 50th year at the Bar in 2022, Rodney’s diary remains busy with the highest quality work.
Reputation
Rodney is a senior junior who has been practising at the highest level for many years. He has been ranked in the Legal 500 for a number of years. ‘Rodney has an exceptionally quick mind. An efficient advocate with the respect of the judiciary’ (Legal 500, 2022) ‘Advocacy always of the highest quality’ (Legal 500)
Expertise
Crime
Rodney has particular skills in cross examining expert witnesses given his long experience in such cross examinations over his many years in practice in matrimonial finance, professional and clinical negligence and personal injury cases.
Inquests
Rodney has many years of experience in Inquests. Highlights being leading the defence team of 5 counsel on behalf of the police officers in Christopher Alder deceased (7 weeks); appointed Counsel to the Inquest for Bradley Parkin deceased (3 weeks).
He has represented family members in fatalities at the workplace and in clinical negligence on many occasions.
For defendants who face potential criminal proceedings and who are subsequently prosecuted at Crown Court.
His experience as a long-established personal injury and clinical negligence practitioner has been relevant in terms of cross-examination, of advising on expert evidence and questioning of expert witnesses in the course of the inquest.
Notable Cases
R v H (2024): Bradford Crown Court. Causing death by careless driving - Suspended Sentence
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c6298g40w0zo
R v Q (2024): Bradford Crown Court. Possession with intent to supply Class A Drugs – Acquitted
R v A (2024): York Crown Court. Conspiracy to commit Kidnap and Robbery – Acquitted
R v Flint (2024): Leeds Crown Court. Possession with intent to supply Class A Drugs (64 Kilos) - Sentence 7 Years
R v Bashir (2023): Bradford Crown Court. Conspiracy to Supply Heroin (33 kilos) / Sentence: 9 month Suspended sentence
R v Ogie (2023): Leeds Crown Court. Murder – Cross examined all 3 other Defendants in cutthroat defence
R v Fitzpatrick (2023): Durham Crown Court. Leading Junior Encrochat Trial being Concerned in supply of Class a Drug (Minimum of 15 Kilo); threats to kill and Blackmail
R v M (2023): Bradford Crown Court. Rape and Serious Sex offences
R v Beech (2023) – Money laundering as banker to an organised crime group totalling £15,000,000.
R v Sekula (2022)(Murder)
R v Badwal (2022) (Murder)
R v Skelly (2022) (Fraud) – leading junior
R v Neal (2021) (15 counts of rape) – leading junior
R v Selvage (2021) (Murder)
R v Ismail (2021) (Court of Appeal) – 17 years reduced to 11 years for perverting course of justice in a gangland murder case as leading junior.
R v Khan & ors (2019): Bradford Crown Court. Leading junior for Salman Ismail in the notorious “Meggy Murder Trial” (Mohammed Nisar Khan).
R v Peter Bacon (2017): Sheffield Crown Court. Manslaughter, prosecuted by a Silk – verdict Not Guilty.
R v Anon (2019): Defence in first ever forced marriage prosecution in the UK. Forced marriage: Leeds parents jailed over [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-45010987][2]
Clerks
Jo Shepherd
Call: 1993
Jo Shepherd
BA (Honours) History
[University College of North Wales (Bangor)
Post-graduate Diploma in Law (Common Professional Examination) [University of Huddersfield]
Bar Vocational Course
[Inns of Court School of Law, London]
Options: Landlord and Tenant (very competent) and Family Law (Competent)
Criminal Bar Association & Northern Circuit
Contact
T: 01274 722 560
Jo was called to the Bar by the Inner Temple in 1993 having completed her BA (Hons) degree in History at the University of Wales. Her pupillage was completed in London, and she has been instructed in Criminal Courts at all levels up to and including the High Court and the Court of Appeal.
She has a wide experience in both Defence and Prosecution and is a Grade 3/RASSO Prosecutor; and was formerly a Grade B for the Health & Safety Executive and HM Revenue and Customs.
Jo is an accredited pupil supervisor.
Her main areas of practice are Criminal Law and General Common Law including regulatory work.
Jo works predominantly in Leeds, Bradford and Manchester Crown Courts – both Prosecuting and Defending cases from Murder and rape to burglary and robbery.
Jo has a particular interest in Mental Health and its application to criminal law – both as a prosecution and defence advocate.
Jo has specialised in road traffic law, conducting cases at all levels -including before the High Court and Administrative Court:
R v B ex parte Preston Crown Court (Administrative Court - Road traffic appeal on costs from Central funds) [2002]
R v M (Case Stated Appeal in High Court - Road Traffic) [2003]
Reputation
Jo has almost 30 years’ experience at the criminal bar.
Expertise
Crime
Jo has almost 30 years’ experience at the criminal bar, both prosecuting and defending, practising at all levels and on both sides of the Pennines, initially in Courts throughout the North West and latterly Leeds, Bradford and York Crown Courts.
Regulatory
Jo has wide experience in both Defence and Prosecution - Grade 3 Crown Prosecutor and previously Grade B Prosecutor on the Attorney-General’s Panel prosecuting on behalf of the HM Revenue & Customs, DTI, Health & Safety Executive. Department of Work & Pensions.
Jo has experience in conducting Inquests and disciplinary hearings before The General Pharmacy Council in addition to prosecuting on behalf of the DTI and HSE.
Jo is interested in being considered for the following areas:
• Professional discipline
• Healthcare Regulatory
• Regulatory – including Health and Safety, The Environment Agency, Local Authority and Trading Standards
• Disclosure and Barring Service Appeals
• Inquests
Notable Cases
R v Bradshaw [2024] Leeds Crown Court – prosecution. 20 year sentence. Three counts of rape of a girl under 13, 11 counts of making an indecent photograph or pseudo photograph of a child, distributing an indecent photograph or pseudo photograph of a child, two counts of possession of a prohibited image of a child, possession of an extreme pornographic images and assault of a girl under 13. https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/leeds-news/sick-leeds-pervert-matthew-bradshaw-29522363
R v M [2022] Bradford Crown Court – defence historic sexual offences
R v C [2022] Leeds Crown Court – defence section 18/Dangerous offender
R v K [2021] Bradford Crown Court – Defence of mentally ill offender charged with Arson
R v Z [2021] York Crown Court – defence rape trial
R v J [2021] Leeds Crown Court – defence rape trial
R v G [2021] Chester Crown Court – defence historic sexual offences trial
R v W [2021] Bradford Crown Court – defence of youth charged with rape.
R v H [2019] Liverpool Crown Court – successfully vacated Guilty plea to section 18 and successfully defended at subsequent trial.
R v S [2019] Chester Crown Court – successfully defended a Defendant with Alzheimer’s charged with historic sexual abuse
R v T (Perverting the course of justice – false alibi to son- lead Defendant in gangland murder) – Liverpool Crown Court [2016] http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/14501799.False_alibi_mum_jailed_for_trying_to_help_killer_son_after__brutal_gang_murder_/
R v L (Prosecution – Fitness to plead and successful Proof of Act/omission) [2016] Leeds Crown Court
R v S (Section 47 trial) Preston Crown Court [2016]
R v M – Class A drugs conspiracy – Liverpool Crown Court [2015]
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/skelmersdale-drugs-gang-sentenced-total-9158118
R v W (Prosecution of Fitness to plead and successful proof of act/omission) [2015] Manchester Crown Court
R v T (section 20 where complainant left with permanent disabilities – conviction following trial) [2014] York Crown Court
R v F (sexual offences committed following release on parole after 20 years – Dangerousness provisions) [2014] – Preston Crown Court
R v B (Successful Prosecution on Section 20 wounding) [2014] Bradford Crown Court
R v L (£200k Theft from Employer by Wife - Acquitted after trial of money laundering - Preston Crown Court) [2012]
R v B (Preston Crown Court – Attempted Murder trial) [2012]
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-17789545
W v DPP (Crown Court - appeal against sentence - “April Jones troll” [2012]
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-20155928
R v H (Murder – pleaded to manslaughter) Liverpool Crown Court [2012]
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-20684079
R v C (Liverpool Crown Court – defended police officer charged with misconduct in public office) [2011]
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/formby-ex-police-officer-jailed-affair-3367078
R v H & Another (successful Appeal against Conviction – Court of Appeal) [2011]
R v P & Others (Defence in multi-handed Drug conspiracy – Preston Crown Court) [2011]
http://www.lep.co.uk/news/local/13-men-face-jail-over-north-west-drugs-conspiracy-1-3986089
R v H (Appeal against Sentence – Court of Appeal
Miss Shepherd was commended by the Honourable Mrs Justice Rafferty on both preparation & presentation) [2010]
R v S & Another (Infamous “Furry case” - Conspiracy to Murder – Junior for Defence – Preston Crown Court) [2009]
R v L (Multi-count historical sex case – Defendant with learning disabilities – Preston Crown Court [2007]
R v Unsworth & S (Murder – Preston Crown Court – junior for the Crown) [2007]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/lancashire/6369319.stm
Clerks
Matthew Rudd
Call: 1994
Matthew Rudd
Head of Employment Law Team
ELA
FLBA
Chambers and Partners
Legal 500
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Matthew is Head of the Employment Team with over 27 years experience. He undertakes work in the Employment Tribunal, Employment Appeal Tribunal and Higher Courts. He is also a member of the Family Team undertaking Financial Remedy and TOLATA and Inheritance Act work. Further, Matthew has expertise in sports law and civil claims relating to his Employment and Financial Remedy Practice.
Reputation
Matthew regularly presents at Employment and Family Seminars and undertakes private FDRs.
Matthew is ranked in Chambers and Partners and the Legal 500 for his Employment practice:
Chambers and Partners UK Bar
“Matthew is a very pragmatic advocate who appreciates the difficulties in a case. He was very cool and calm, and the client was very happy. Matthew has good client care skills, readily picked up the issues and provided sound advice. Matthew is a solid go-to barrister who cuts through the case to get to the key issues. Matthew's vast experience leads to wise and measured decisions." (2025)
”Matthew is very calm under fire and builds great rapport with clients, and he's good on his feet." (2024)
"Matthew Rudd is head of the chambers' employment law practice. He is well versed in a range of complex unfair dismissal and discrimination claims" (2023)
"Effective and enormously experienced, he has impressed me. He can really analyse the important merits of a claim." "An experienced employment barrister, he is thorough and pragmatic as well as being a good advocate." "He cuts through legal issues and explains everything with such ease." (2022)
Legal 500
“An unflappable barrister with gravitas and natural authority.” (2025)
“Band 2 Advocate” (2024)
"A tenacious advocate with a calming influence. Practical, thorough and exceptionally dedicated" (2023)
'An exceptionally dedicated barrister. He cuts through complex legal issues with ease. Experienced and unflappable.”(2022)
Expertise
Employment
As Head of the Employment Law Team, Matthew undertakes work for both employees and employers and has extensive experience in Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, TUPE and Restrictive Covenants. He regularly handles multi-day cases with large bundles.
Family Law
Matthew has considerable experience in Financial Remedy high value asset cases and cases involving family businesses. He regularly undertakes TOLATA work and Inheritance Act Claims.
Civil and Sports Law
Matthew undertakes Civil and Sports Law work connected to his Employment and Family practice.
Professional Discipline & RegulationMatthew Rudd is Head of the Employment Team and has extensive experience in regulatory work for organisations and individuals related to his practice in employment law. Mr Rudd is regularly involved in cases involving the NHS, Councils and Educational establishments. Mr Rudd provides representation and advice for individuals and organisations at disciplinary tribunals involving doctors, dentists, nurses, teachers, sports and the police. In the education setting Mr Rudd has had extensive experience as a chair of a board of school governors and is familiar with the education setting. Mr Rudd provides representation during all stages of the professional disciplinary process, particularly specialising in:
• Sport body disciplinary Hearings
• Police Disciplinary Hearings
• Fitness to Practice Panel Hearings
• Interim Orders Panel Hearings
• Registration Appeal Panel Hearings
• Review Hearings
• Investigative Hearings
Notable Cases
F v H: Successful Claim for unfair dismissal and discrimination and successfully defended the appeal to the EAT;
C v SDCC Arguments over whether conditions amounted to a disability with a large number of witnesses and whether dismissal due to disability or SOSR;
F v JCT Claim involving unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. Respondents awarded £10,000 costs despite Claimant claiming to be impecunious;
B v SN Advising the Claimant in ongoing ET proceedings involving claims for harassment, victimisation and sexual orientation discrimination over a number of years;
I v A Represented the Claimant in a complex claim for breach of contract and unlawful deductions from wages with a counterclaim by the Respondent. Successful in all aspects of the claim;
U v L & C Complex case involving a TUPE transfer acting for the transferee who was jointly and severally liable for obligations of the transferor under regulations 13 and 14 of TUPE. Multi handed case involving test Claimants for 25 representative Claimants.
Clerks
Abigail Langford
Call: 2005
Abigail Langford
LL.B (Hons), Leeds University (2003)
LL.M, Newcastle University (2005)
Lincoln’s Inn
Legal Aid Supplier Number 201LJ
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Abigail is Head of the Criminal Team and undertakes both prosecution and defence work across the North Eastern Circuit. A Grade 4 prosecutor and a member of the CPS Rape and Serious Sexual Assault Panel, she is experienced in dealing with cases involving vulnerable witnesses, particularly young witnesses and defendants. Abigail has experience in working with Defendants with mental illness, including conducting conferences/ hearings in a hospital setting.
Abigail has a particular specialism in disclosure and has conducted a number of complex operations in this area. Abigail has particular expertise in firearms cases and has been involved in a number of high profile cases of this kind.
Abigail is also a member of the Professional Discipline, Regulatory and Licensing Team.
Reputation
Abigail is Head of the Criminal Team and regularly presents webinars to the CPS, the Police and Solicitors.
Expertise
Crime
Abigail’s expertise also includes:
- Murder, Attempted Murder and Manslaughter
- Sex and Drug Trafficking
- Cases involving high profile individuals, public bodies and politically sensitive cases
- Terrorism
- Cases involving vulnerable victims such as Baby Shaking
- Modern Slavery
- Kidnap
- Cyber Crime
- Armed Robbery
Regulatory
Abigail has previously undertaken work on behalf of the NMC and understand the levels of client care needed in this area of work. Through her crown court practice Abigail has additionally been able to work with the police on non-crown court work, liasing with the force solicitor and other professionals . Abigail has also been instructed in mental health tribunal work and enjoys this area. Through her sound knowledge of police procedure and practice Abigail is keen to undertake inquest work.
Notable Cases
R v Mafaune (2025)
Prosecuted Patson Mafaune, who was sentenced to 32 years for attempted murder after he shot at a man in the streets of Leeds in July 2024. Abigail was instructed by the CPS and worked with the Homicide and Major Enquiry Team. News Coverage: https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/crime/drive-by-shooter-jailed-for-attempting-to-kill-foe-outside-burger-bar-5019886
R v Anon (2024)
Stephen led Abigail Langford prosecuted two teenagers for hacking to death Harley Brown, using machetes. News Coverage: https://news.sky.com/story/harley-browns-killers-sentenced-to-life-for-stabbing-him-to-death-after- chance-meeting-outside-huddersfield-shop-13033725
R v Francis (2024)
Stephen Wood KC leading Abigail Langford were instructed by Yorkshire and Humberside CPS to prosecute Francis for the brutal murder of a woman and the rapes of a further woman. The defendant was convicted of all counts and was sentenced to life imprisonment and ordered to serve a minimum term of 28 years. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3rwprlx7e8o7
R v Mohsin Hussain (2023)
Prosecution of Mohsin Hussain for causing death by dangerous driving after 7-year-old boy was killed in Bradford. Hussain received nine years and nine months imprisonment. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-67512817
R v Dale Osborne (2023)
Prosecution of nine rapes, six actual bodily harm offences, one attempted rape, one sexual assault, three threats to kill and two false imprisonments. Defendant received 22 years imprisonment. https://www.westyorkshire.police.uk/news-appeals/man-jailed-multiple-rapes-bradford
R v Fanty and Others (2022)
Prosecution, Obtained convictions after trial of all Defendants on all counts for murder, attempted murder, conspiracy to possess modified firearms and ammunition with intent to endanger life, and conspiracy to supply controlled drugs of Class A.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-61964013R v Taylor Meanley & ors (2021)
Drive-by shooting which led to the death of a 21 year old. Abigail’s main responsibility was dealing with the technical and phone evidence.
R v Anthony Atha (2021)
Successfully defended Anthony Atha who was tried in relation to an offence of murder. The defendant had mental health problems and he was the only defendant in the trial to be acquitted. The case was high profile.
R v Rehan Baig (2020)
Prosecuted man who admitted to having sexual intercourse with live chickens. There was video evidence.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12969101/sick-dad-sex-familys-pet-chickens/
R v Matthew Herring [2019]
Prosecution of firearm discharge in Sheffield. Sentenced to 14 years.
R v Elizabeth Childs [2019]
Female defendant who stole £30,000 from children’s centre.
R v Ashraf Khan [2018]
Prosecuted defendant who fathered three children by his own daughter. The victim admitted to her husband on her deathbed that the father of the children was her father. Received a 4 year and a half year sentence.
R v R [2019]
Defence of a mentally impaired defendant in relation to serious sexual offending against young members of his family . The case involved consideration of both psychiatric and psychological expert evidence.
Clerks
Kathryn Pitters
Call: 2008
Kathryn Pitters
The London School of Economics: Law LLB
The University of Oxford: Criminal Law and Policy MSc
The Honourable Society of the Middle Temple
Contact
E: clerks@broadwayhouse.co.uk
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Kathryn Pitters has an extensive background in regulatory work, criminal defence and prosecution, representing clients in complex and high-profile cases. Kathryn previously held positions as an associate within Irwin Mitchell LLP and Capsticks Solicitors. With over a decade of practice at the independent Bar on the Northern, Eastern, and South Eastern circuits, Kathryn has solidified her experience in regulatory and criminal work.
Kathryn has advised and represented families, professionals, and companies during inquests, particularly when there were concerns related to the care provided to the deceased by the Trust. Her expertise includes managing intricate inquests that have garnered significant press attention. Additionally, she has successfully defended professionals such as solicitors, doctors, nurses, accountants, dentists, and psychotherapists before their respective regulatory bodies during interim, review, final hearings and at the High Court.
Kathryn has provided advice on Care Quality Commission and Ofsted investigations and crafted written representations, as well as defended multiple cases prosecuted by the Health and Safety Executive and appealed against DBS barring decisions.
In her criminal work, Kathryn has represented defendants in a variety of cases, including fraud, sexual offenses, possession of indecent images, violence, and drug offenses within the Crown Court.
Kathryn has provided advice or Emmerdale, Coronation Street and Waterloo Road.
Kathryn holds Direct Access qualifications with practicing certificate litigation rights and has been listed in the 2025 edition of the Legal 500 for her contributions to criminal work. Whilst at the Independent Bar Kathryn was listed on multiple occasions within the Legal 500 for professional discipline.
Reputation
Expertise
Regulatory
• Advised and represented families, professionals, and companies during high-stakes inquests where significant concerns were raised regarding the care provided to the deceased by the Trust. These complex inquests often attracted substantial media attention.
• Provided exemplary representation for professionals, including solicitors, doctors, nurses, accountants, dentists, and psychotherapists, before their respective regulatory bodies during interim, review, and final hearings.
• Presented cases on behalf of Social Work England and for the Solicitors Regulatory Authority (SRA) before fitness to practice committees and before the High Court.
• Achieved considerable success in preparing representations for the General Dental Council’s (GDC) case examiners on behalf of numerous members of the British Dental Association.
• Skillfully appeared before the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service to advocate for doctors, including senior consultants, in intricate cases presented by the General Medical Council (GMC).
• Delivered expert advice concerning Care Quality Commission (CQC) investigations and meticulously prepared written representations.
• Defended a multitude of cases prosecuted by the Health and Safety Executive. • Represented teachers before the Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA).
• Provided robust defense for solicitors facing serious professional misconduct allegations before the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
• Representation for students during university disciplinary investigations/hearings and representation with appeals to the ombudsman.
• Appeals against Ofsted and the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS)
• Training support for Trusts regarding the Coronial Process.
• Regularly listed in the Legal 500 for regulatory work.
Financial Services Regulatory Work
Advised various clients in relation to FCA issues, including:• European Insurer selling insurance products in the UK post Brexit; review of the Insurers PRIIPS KID documentation to ensure compliance with recent UK regulations and FCA’s consumer duty obligations.
• Several M&A deals valued at between £35 – £60m; submission of multiple change of control applications to the FCA and advice on notification of breaches of FCA regulations.
• International bank regarding investigations on conduct rule breaches and provision and submission of FCA regulatory references.
• FCA regulated parts of Irwin Mitchell business/ financial instructions regarding application for FCA’s clawback provisions.
• AML advice and reviews of documentation, policies and procedures.
• Senior executive (CEO) regarding FCA conduct rules breaches.
• Board of Directors of a FTSE 250 company around potential AML breaches and a fraud committed by an employee; reporting to the Police and regulator.
• Provided training to the Board of Directors on Bribery and Corruption, Fraud and Corporate Manslaughter.
• A motor finance business regarding finance agreements.
• Director accused of fraud by the FCA at Southwark Crown Court.
Criminal Work
• R v S (and others) 2024: Represented D1 in a 7 million fraud at Hull Crown Court• R v A 2022: Represented a defendant who was charged with historic sexual offences during a fitness ot plead trial at Hull Crown Court leading to most of the offences not being proved and an absolute discharge imposed.
• R v B 2023 (Sheffield Crown Court): Defendant charged with historic sexual offences against his daughter.
• Representation of numerous defendants’ charges with the possession of indecent images.
• Representation of numerous defendants charged with offences of violence or with drug offences within the Crown Court.
• Provision of advice in respect of appeals to the Court of Appeal against conviction/sentence
• Acted as led junior (Grade 3 Prosecutor) in cases prosecuted by the Crown Prosecution Service, Serious Fraud Office, the FCA, HMRC and the Pensions Regulator.
• Advised on private prosecutions.
• Advisor to ITV in respect of their scripts for Emmerdale. Previously advised Coronation Street and Waterloo Road.
• Direct Access Qualified with practicing certificate litigation rights.
• Listed in the 2025 edition of the Legal 500 for criminal work.
Notable Cases
R v S (2024) (Hull Crown Court)– Represented the first defendant in an 8 million pound VAT Fraud
R v A and Others (Southwark Crown Court) – Prosecuted as led-junior multiple defendants convicted of a multi-million fraud involving the importation of counterfeit goods.
R v D – Prosecution of a widely reported significant fraud involving a ponzi scheme.
R v A (2022) (Hull Crown Court) – Represented the Defendant in fitness to plead proceedings involving allegations of historic sexual offences.
R v B (2023) (Sheffield Crown Court) – Defendant charged with multiple historic sexual offences on his daughters.
R v Cn – A leading case on costs.
R v D – Representation of a doctor during an inquest and GMC proceedings involved in a maternal death.
SWE v P - Representation of a social worker charged with multiple allegations of historic sexual assault.
Legal advisor for ITV (Emmerdale and Coronation Street)
Clerks
Clare Walsh
Call: 2009
Clare Walsh
M.A. (Hons) Classics, University of Cambridge (2007, Upper Second Class)
Graduate Diploma in Law, BPP Law School, Leeds (2008)
Bar Vocational Course, BPP Law School, Leeds (2009, Very Competent)
Legal Aid Supplier Number 245TY
Clare is a member of the Criminal Bar Association.
In 2022, Clare was appointed as Deputy District Judge (Magistrates Courts)
Grade 3 Prosecutor
RASSO Panel
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Clare Walsh (née Benson) first joined Broadway House Chambers in 2009 as a pupil to Sophie Drake, now HHJ Sophie McKone. She accepted tenancy in 2010 and has remained at Broadway House Chambers ever since.
Clare practices predominantly in criminal law and is a regular feature in the Crown Courts of Yorkshire. She also has significant experience in regulatory matters, as well as mental health and prison law.
In addition to her busy practice, Clare now sits as a Deputy District Judge in the Magistrates’ Courts.
Clare is on the RASSO panel and is a Grade 3 prosecutor.
Reputation
In May 2017, Clare wrote an article entitled “The impact of the Ched Evans case on the law surrounding a Complainant’s sexual history” which can be found on the Broadway House website.
In July 2020 Clare gave a presentation on Cross-Admissibility at the Broadway House Annual Prosecution Seminar.
Expertise
Crime
Clare prosecutes and defends in the Crown Court in all areas of crime. She regularly deals with cases involving violence and is often instructed in matters involving young and vulnerable witnesses. Clare’s experience in the Crown Court ranges all the way from cases involving assault occasioning actual bodily harm, robbery, benefit fraud and indecent image offences, to s.18 wounding with intent, aggravated burglary and armed robbery, the supply of drugs, possession of firearms, high value fraud and serious sexual offences.
Clare has recent experience as Led Junior for both the Prosecution and the Defence.
Clare is on the RASSO panel and is a Grade 3 prosecutor.
Clare is also often instructed for the Defence as lone Junior in matters of serious sexual offences.
Sports Law
Clare joined the Sports Law Team as a consequence of her experience in disciplinary and regulatory proceedings in other professional fields. She also has a keen interest in Anti-Doping.
Clare’s experience as a criminal advocate has meant she has developed a particular interest in how the media treat those involved in sport who are accused of crimes and how this affects their careers.
Regulation + Judicial Review
In addition to her busy criminal law practice Clare has experience of representing lay clients and Local Authorities in taxi licensing matters and in environmental law cases. She has significant experience representing clients in Mental Health Act tribunals. Clare also practices in prison law and has appeared in Disciplinary and Parole Board hearings. Clare has also appeared before the Nursing and Midwifery Council on behalf of registrants in both interim and full hearings.
Notable Cases
COURT OF APPEAL (Criminal Division)
R v Iqbal (Rashid) [2022] – Clare represented this Appellant convicted of historical sexual offences. The appeal centred on the way the sentencing Judge had dealt with the issue of totality. The Court of Appeal agreed with her submissions in this regard and reduced the overall sentence from 12 to 10 years.
R v Craggs (Patrick John) [2018] EWCA Crim 1117 - Clare represented this Defendant, charged with Causing Serious Injury by Dangerous Driving and multiple Hanoi burglaries. The case involved issues surrounding fitness to plead, credit for plea and ultimately, when it came to sentence, matters of totality. There were sensitive matters to raise in mitigation. Following sentencing in the Crown Court, Clare took the case to the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), where she successfully persuaded the Court that the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive, resulting in the total period of imprisonment being reduced from 12 years 2 months to 7 years 2 months.
CROWN COURT
R v Feve, Wattam and ors (2023) Led junior and successfully prosecuted defendants for Murder, Manslaughter and Perverting the Course of Justice.News coverage: https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/news/grimsby-news/kian-feve-guilty-murdering-jack-8960407 and https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2e20rv7g22o
R v W (2021) Clare was led Junior for the Defence in this trial for Murder.
R v C (2021) Clare represented a young woman who pleaded guilty on the day of trial to a matter of Assisting an Offender, where her co-accused stood convicted of Attempt Murder and ultimately received a sentence exceeding 15 years. Clares client was made subject of a Suspended Sentence Order.
R v C (2021) Clare was led Junior for the Prosecution in this trial involving historical serious sexual offences against multiple victims. There were issues involving loss of historical ABE interviews and accounts, as well as hearsay and cross-admissibility. The case resulted in convictions on all Counts and the Defendant receiving a sentence of over 28 years’ imprisonment.
R v W (2018) Clare represented the Defendant in this complex POCA matter in which the benefit figure exceeded £4,000,000 and in which it was alleged there were hidden assets. Ultimately the available amount was agreed at just over £85,000, which was half what the Prosecution had originally applied for.
R v H & B (2017) Clare prosecuted this case in which a firearm was discharged in a busy nightclub, causing injury to a bystander. One of the Defendants, H, took the matter to trial. The case involved consideration of a large amount of CCTV, all of which had to be presented to a jury. Furthermore, following sentencing, Clare advised the Crown as to the unduly lenient sentencing of H. Based on this advice, the case was taken up by Treasury Counsel who successfully presented the matter before the Court of Appeal.
Clerks
Adam Willoughby
Call: 2011
Adam Willoughby
Head of Sports Law & Deputy Head of the Employment Law Team
LL.B (Hons) Law, University of Hull, First Class Honours (2010)
Bar Professional Training Course, BPP Law School, Leeds (2011)
Inaugural Middle Temple Master Rose Scholarship Award (2010)
Middle Temple
Legal Aid Supplier No. 02DXD
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Adam specialises in:
Employment Law
Sports, Media, and Entertainment Law
Business, Property and Probate Litigation
Matrimonial Finance (with an emphasis on commercial and complex pension interests)
Adam has been described as having “an impressive analytical ability, a reassuring manner and a highly effective cross-examination style” who “always delivers impeccable results” (Chambers and Partners).
Reputation
Adam is head of the Sports, Media and Entertainment Team and Deputy Head of the Employment Law Team. Adam is recognised within Chambers and Partners and has recently been noted as:
"Adam Willoughby is deputy head of the employment law team. He is praised for his work in complex discrimination claims, particularly involving vulnerable claimants. He offers expertise across the whole range of employment law, acting for claimants and respondents.He is a very clever chap with an excellent employment practice."
(Chambers and Partners)
"Adam’s preparation and attention to detail is always first rate. He has an impressive analytical ability, a reassuring manner and a highly effective cross-examination style". "He goes over and above on every case, he has an incredible manner with the clients, and he is such a kind and generous person with his time who always delivers impeccable results". "He is an approachable barrister who is thorough and diligent".
(Chambers and Partners, 2022)
Client feedback has identified Adam as an “impressive and highly effective advocate” with “exceptional analytical ability” and as “tactically very astute”. Adam is a “formidable advocate” with “exceptional intellectual ability”. His written opinions have been described as “clear, concise and thorough” and his pleadings are “consistently very good”.
Adam is also a highly sought after speaker having been invited to speak to delegations in New York, Dallas, Chicago and the UK.
Expertise
Employment
Adam is the Deputy Head of Employment Law and acts for businesses and individual clients both in the Employment Tribunal as well as in High Court commercial disputes arising from the employment relationship. Adam regularly advises and represents parties to appeals before the Employment Appeal Tribunal and Court of Appeal.
Adam is highly sought after across the range of employment disputes, from unfair dismissal and discrimination cases to whistleblowing, equal pay, working time and TUPE issues. Adam also represents individuals the subject of disciplinary and regulatory proceedings.
Adam has established an excellent reputation for advising and representing professional sports clubs and athletes as well as corporate and individual clients operating in the Media and Entertainment industry in relation to disputes arising from contractual relationships and in regulatory and disciplinary matters.
Adam regularly appears in the Queen’s Bench Division and Chancery Division of the High Court in relation to litigation arising from the employment relationship and in relation to claims concerning director and shareholder responsibilities, including:
• Claims for unpaid wages, bonus, commission, and wrongful termination
• Restrictive covenants
• Breach of confidence
• Team moves and springboard relief
• Breach of fiduciary duty
• Shareholder disputes and s. 994 petitions
• Privacy and Defamation
• Intellectual Property
Sports, Media, and Entertainment Law
Adam is the Head of the Sports, Media and Entertainment Group. He acts in a diverse range of high profile and complex cases in the High Court and before tribunals, arbitral panels as well as in disciplinary and appeals panels.
The strength of Adam’s practice lies in his existing expertise in the complimentary fields of employment, corporate and commercial law.
Adam advises and represents sports clients, including athletes, teams, clubs, agents, broadcasters, and international and national sports governing bodies in disputes concerning:
• Commercial and contractual
• Disciplinary and regulatory
• Regulatory governance
• Anti-doping
• Privacy and Defamation
• Intellectual Property
Adam acts for a wide range of artists, performers and media personalities in disputes concerning:
• Privacy and Defamation
• Intellectual property
• Commercial and Contract
• Licensing
• Pre-publication injunctions
• Reputation management
Business, Property and Probate Litigation
Adam acts in a wide range of high value and complex disputes on behalf of claimant’s, defendants, and intervenors. Adam has established a strong reputation in representing and advising clients in the sports, media and entertainment industries as well as individuals and companies in disputes arising from the employment relationship. Adam advises and represents clients in disputes concerning:
• Commercial and employment contracts
• Restrictive covenants
• Team moves and springboard relief
• Breach of confidence
• Defamation and Privacy
• Intellectual Property
• Breach of fiduciary duty
• Claims for unpaid wages, bonus, commission, and wrongful termination
• Shareholder disputes and s. 994 petitions
• Partnership
• Agency
• Equitable Relief
• Professional Negligence
• Trusts, both express and implied, including TOLATA claims
• Family Provision – Inheritance Act 1975 applications
• Wills, Probate & Administration of Estates
Family
Adam has particular expertise in cases which include commercial interests, complex pension arrangements and in cases concerning complex corporate structures and trusts.
Adam advises and represents clients in ancillary relief proceedings from pre-issue to final hearings. Adam is highly sought after in cases featuring overseas assets, offshore accounts, special contributions within the marriage, inherited wealth, insolvency and financial dishonesty, alongside needs-based cases.
In addition to matrimonial finance, Adam advises and represents clients in cases brought under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 and Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
Regulatory
Adam provides specialist advice and representation in cases concerning disciplinary and regulatory law across a wide range of sectors, including healthcare, financial services, professional services, legal services, media and sport. Adam has also appeared in several inquests at which he represented healthcare professionals accused of serious misconduct.
Adam represents clients at all stages of proceedings before disciplinary panels, statutory tribunals and before the courts, including the appellate courts. Adam understands the potential reputational damage that such proceedings can cause and so works in a client-focused manner, providing straight-forward and practical advice at the early stages of proceedings. The strength of Adam’s practice lies in his existing expertise in the complimentary fields of employment, corporate and commercial law.
Examples of Adam’s work include advising and representing clients before the General Osteopathic Council’s Professional Conduct Committee, the Nursing and Midwifery Council’s Fitness to Practise Committee, Sports Resolution UK, the Court of Arbitration for Sport, Rugby Football Union Panel, the Health and Care Professions Council and the General Medical Council’s Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service.
Notable Cases
Fatima v Family Channel Ltd & anor [2020] EWCA Civ 824
Represented appellant in her appeal to the Court of Appeal which considered the interplay between an unsuccessful application to adjourn a trial under CPR 3.1(2)(b) and a subsequent application under CPR 39.3 to set aside judgment against a non-attending party.
Tattu Manchester Ltd v Powell (Employment Appeal Tribunal)
Represented the respondent in her response to an appeal to the EAT which considered whether the Tribunal had wrongly interpreted a bonus scheme to mean pre rather than post EBIDTA figures and whether it had wrong concluded there had been a breach of contract.
Jones v. G4S Secure Solutions (Employment Appeal Tribunal)
Represented the respondent in its appeal to the EAT which considered whether there had been a dismissal of the claimant following reinstatement on a domestic appeal, considering Roberts v. West Coast Trains Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 900.
Thomas v Ladbrokes Betting and Gaming Ltd (Employment Appeal Tribunal)
Represented the claimant in her appeal brought by the respondent in which the EAT considered whether the Tribunal had substituted its view for that of the employer in finding that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed.
Hunt v. DVSA (Employment Appeal Tribunal)
Represented the appellant in her appeal on the issue of whether the Tribunal erred in its findings that she was not constructively dismissal.
Featherstone Rovers v Griffin
Represented the club concerning breach of contract by a player.
Keith Deller Sports Management Limited v Adrian Jackpot Lewis Limited & Adrian Lewis
Represented Sports Agent concerning claim against a professional darts player for unpaid fees and in its defence of a counterclaim alleging breach of the agency agreement.
Other examples of Adam’s recent work includes:
Representing an RFL club in a dispute with a player who breached his playing contract by having unauthorised dealings with a competing club.
Representing a high-profile professional football player in a claim brought by his former agent in respect of unpaid commissions.
Representing an international rugby player concerning his blocked transfer to another club in Canada.
Representing a professional footballer in a claim against him by a sponsor for breach of the sponsorship agreement.
Representing a multi-national firm in a claim for injunctive relief and damages against a former employee in respect of alleged misuse of commercially sensitive information and breach of restrictive covenants.
Represented a claimant in a petition under s. 994 Companies Act 2006 following her exclusion as a minority shareholder and deprivation of dividend payments. Relief sought was in excess of £19m.
Representing a defendant in a dispute concerning an alleged indemnity to return sales commissions.
Advising and representing an international firm in a claim for injunctive relief and damages against a former employee in respect of alleged misuse of commercially sensitive information and breach of restrictive covenants.
Representing a nationwide motor trading company in its defence of claims of passing off, breach of trademark and copyright.
Advising and representing a high-profile professional footballer in ancillary relief proceedings which included defending the claims of an agent intervening.
Advising and representing an applicant in ancillary relief proceedings in which the key issue concerned a substantial discretionary family trust worth in excess of £30m.
Advising a national publication as to allegations of defamatory statements against a competing publication.
Advising an international food manufacturing company in the wake of public allegations of mislabelling products.
Clerks
Laura McBride
Call: 2012
Laura McBride
Deputy Head of the Criminal Law Team
LL.B (Hons), University of Newcastle (2010)
Bar Professional Training Course (2012)
Middle Temple
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02DNO
Grade 3 RASSO Prosecutor
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Laura McBride is a highly regarded and experienced advocate practicing in all areas of criminal law, professional discipline and inquests.
Laura is the Deputy Head of the Criminal Team at Broadway House Chambers. She is a Grade 3 prosecutor and a member of the CPS Rape and Serious Sexual Assault Panel.
L M McBride LTD trading as Laura McBride
Reputation
- Assistant Legal Advisor BBC National Treasure (2016)
- Disclosure seminars: CPS, South Yorkshire Police, Broadway House Chambers annual conference
Expertise
Crime
Laura is the Deputy Head of the Criminal team at Broadway House Chambers.
Laura is a sought-after trial advocate. Her attention to detail and in-depth understanding of disclosure in criminal cases are second to none. She is a persuasive jury advocate and her reputation means that she is often instructed in serious, complex and high-profile cases, for example, the Rotherham child sexual abuse trials and prosecutions relating to the Hillsborough disaster.
Laura has experience dealing with young and highly vulnerable witnesses and defendants. She has a wide range of experience and has been instructed in cases involving offences of murder, attempt murder, serious sexual offences, human trafficking and fraud.
Her outstanding ability is reflected in her level of experience and success.
L M McBride LTD trading as Laura McBride
Notable Cases
R v P and B – Ongoing high-profile prosecution into historical physical and sexual abuse at a residential care home. Led by Michele Colborne KC.
R v H (2025) - Defence – Trial involved allegations of historical rape in a domestic context.
R v W (2025) - Defence - Defence trial involving multiple allegations of rape by 4 complainants. Case included both historical and present-day allegations.
R v A [2025] – Defence – Historical allegations of rape. Complex legal arguments relating to the admissibility of deceased witness evidence as hearsay.
R v M (2025) – Defence – High-profile case involving extensive evidence. Defendant charged with conspiracy to convey prohibited items into custody. Laura McBride led Lauren Smith.
R v S (2025) – Defence - Defendant charged with manslaughter. Case involves complex legal arguments including the interpretation of the law in relation to Unlawful Act Manslaughter. Led by Michelle Colborne KC.
R v R (2025) – Defence – Represented the interests of a Defendant who was found unfit to plead by the court and at the subsequent finding of fact hearing.
R v H [2024] – Prosecution - Prosecution trial involving allegations of a series of sexual offences and grooming of a 14 year old girl.
R v Smalley & Leaning (2024) - Prosecution - Successful prosecution of two defendants convicted of murder and manslaughter. Led by Michelle Colborne KC
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99xn88pgp2o.amp
R v B (2024) – Prosecution - Charged with possession with intent to supply class A and class B drugs. Sentenced to four years and nine months. https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/leeds-news/leeds-mans-mum-said-adhd-30104475
R v S (2024) – Defence – Instructed for defence of client charged with possession of Class A Drugs with intent to supply and dangerous driving. Found with 57kg of cocaine with a street value of £5.7m-£7m. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2k005g3lzo
R v W (2024) – Prosecution – Defendant charged of causing bodily harm by wanton and furious driving. W was cycling at speed and highly impaired by alcohol. She injured a pedestrian who then required a hip replacement. W was sentenced to 8 months imprisonment. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx88g1v8en7o
R v SP (2024): Prosecution junior counsel in an allegation of murder. The case involves complex medical evidence relating to the defendant’s mental health at the time of the incident.
R v SK and Others (2024): Junior counsel involving the prosecution of an OCG involved in Class A and Class B drugs supply in the West Yorkshire area.
R v AA (2024): Defence counsel in a large scale CSE grooming trial in the Bradford area.
R v NK and NK (2024): Prosecution counsel in a case alleging kidnap and serious assault.
R v MR and others (2023): Defence junior counsel in one of the first prosecutions in the UK involving the manufacturing of 3D printed firearms.
R v TS (2023): Defence counsel in a prosecution of an OCG following the high profile infiltration of the Encrochat platform by international law enforcement agencies. This case involved the estimated supply of over 100kg of class A drugs (Estimated valuation £4 million).
R v JW (2023): Defence junior counsel in a high-profile case of fraud involving a politician. The defendant was acquitted of all counts following trial.
R v LT (2023): Defence counsel in a case in which the defendant was charged with attempt murder.
R v K & ors (2022): Laura is currently prosecuting a multi-handed robbery. Defendants accused of partaking in several robberies over the course of a matter of months.
R v Selby (2022): Prosecution counsel - The defendant was convicted of aggravated burglary following trial.
R v K (2022): Laura represented the defendant, an NHS employee, who was acquitted of all charges following trial.
R v Hussain & ors (2021): Junior in a Rotherham historical child grooming case. Led by Jayne Beckett.
R v D (2020): Defendant was charged with Rape and was acquitted following trial. Use of unused material including telephone logs and medical evidence that had been disclosed in order to discredit witness. Use of vulnerable witness protocols including section 28 procedure.
R v H (2020): Prosecuted defendant who was charged with child cruelty against his 2 year old stepson. H was convicted after trial and the case involved use of medical evidence demonstrating causation of injuries.
R v B (2020): Defendant originally charged with attempted murder but was instead charged with Robbery and a Section 18. Defended and led by Rodney Ferm.
Operation Kavaic 1/2 (Sept 2018/July 2019): Part of operation Stovewood. First operation led by Michelle Colborne KC and second operation led by Ann Cotcher KC. Laura was the disclosure Junior. High profile Rotherham CSE grooming Case. https://www.rotherhamadvertiser.co.uk/news/view,breaking-child-abuse-gang-jailed-for-a-total-of-101-years_29495.htm
R v Mohammed Nisar Khan & ors (2019): Disclosure junior in high profile Bradford murder. As a result of the work undertaken, Laura received two awards from the Police. https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/17610266.mohammed-nisar-meggy-khan-tony-grant-salman-ismail-sentenced-bradford-moor-murder-trial/
Operation Thunder (2017): Prosecution Junior led by Sophie Drake (Now HHJ McKone). This case formed part of the investigation into Child Sexual Exploitation in the Rotherham area. https://www.itv.com/news/calendar/2017-01-25/five-rotherham-men-found-guilty-of-historic-sex-abuse.
Operation Clover 2 (2016): Prosecution Disclosure Junior in a high profile multi-handed trial regarding Child Sexual Exploitation in the Rotherham area in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-37873340
R v Hussain and Others (2016): Disclosure junior in the high profile Rotherham abuse trial.
R v Halligan (2016): Prosecuted a sentence in a s18 wounding with intent and possession of an offensive weapon. The defendant was deemed dangerous and received an extended custodial sentence.
R v Baron (2016): Represented a man who pleaded guilty to converting criminal property in a multi-handed fraud trial.
R v Madden (2016): Represented a man who pleaded guilty to possession of a high number of indecent images.
R v Egan (2015): Successfully prosecuted a trial of sexual assault on a female and assault.
R v H (2015): Laura secured a conviction in a racially aggravated public order offence involving the use of an intermediary.
R v P (2015): Laura successfully defended a private ambulance driver charged with driving through a red light. The case was dismissed.
R v D (2015): Laura prosecuted a serving Police Officer who was convicted both at the Magistrates’ Court and following an Appeal, a case reported by the National press.
Clerks
Harry Wiltshire
Call: 2015
Harry Wiltshire
Bath University, BA Hons Business Administration
GDL and BPTC, BPP Leeds
Middle Temple, Harmsworth Scholar
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02GCI
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Harry is experienced in representing both Claimants and Respondents in the employment tribunal, he regularly appears in cases dealing with unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, unlawful deductions, discrimination, whistle blowing and employment status.
Harry accepts instructions in private law children matters. He regularly deals with contested final hearings and multi day finding of fact hearings, including issues such as domestic violence and relocation.
Harry is developing a growing matrimonial finance practice, he is regularly instructed to undertake Financial Dispute Resolution Appointments and Final Hearings.
Harry is registered with the Bar Council to undertake direct access work.
Harry is a member of Broadway House Chambers Business, Property and Probate Team. Prior to Pupillage Harry ran his own business, he has a strong understanding of the pressures involved in the management of a SME and is comfortable dealing with commercial disputes.
Prior to pupillage Harry competed as a professional athlete. Harry is Deputy Head of Sports, Media and Entertainment Team. He has gained experience of contractual disputes and disciplinary proceedings in the sporting arena. He has also been involved in the representation of athletes in anti-doping and disciplinary proceedings before governing bodies, Sports Resolution UK and the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
Reputation
Expertise
Employment
Harry regularly represents both Claimants and Respondents in the Employment Tribunal. He accepts instructions to advise, undertake drafting and attend hearings. Harry deals with a wide range of issues, including: employment status, unfair dismissal, discrimination (including disability and sex), whistleblowing detriment and holiday pay.
Sport
Prior to pupillage Harry spent 15 years competing as a professional athlete regularly representing Great Britain at international level. Harry’s experience as an athlete gives him a huge advantage when approaching sport cases and makes him a very appealing choice for lay clients in the sports arena.
Harry has experience of sports contract disputes and disciplinary proceedings. He has been involved in the representation of athletes in anti-doping and disciplinary proceedings before governing bodies, Sports Resolution UK and the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Harry is on the panel of regional Rugby Football Union prosecutors.
Harry works closely with Adam Willoughby, Head of the Sports Law Team. Harry has assisted him in dealing with contractual matters on behalf of Rugby Football League Teams and the preparation of anti-doping cases on behalf of athletes who have returned adverse analytical findings.
Harry’s Sports Law practice is complimented by his special interest in employment and contractual law.
Family Law
Harry practices in private children law and financial remedy.
Notable Cases
Mr AY Ali v Salix Homes and Michael Page International Recruitment Limited Case No. 2404266/2018
Successfully represented a recruitment agency over a four day hearing securing a finding that they could not have dismissed an agency worker on the grounds of a protected disclosure, when they had no knowledge of the disclosure at the time of dismissal. The case also raised a breach of contract, direct discrimination and worker/ employee status.
Mrs C Tantrum -v- Ashville College and others 180078/2018
Successfully argued at a three day hearing that the Claimant was an employee rather than a self employed sports teacher working at a private school. The finding meant that the matter settled following a judicial mediation. The case raised issues of protected disclosures, an unfair dismissal, holiday pay and unlawful deduction from wages
Smith -v- Bradford District Care NHS
Representing the Claimant at a three day hearing dealing with claims of indirect discrimination on the grounds of disability, as well as harassment and failure to make reasonable adjustments.
Mr J Bassey -v- HMRC
Junior Counsel representing the respondent at a three week tribunal dealing with 88 allegations of harassment and racial discrimination.
Ms KJ Badon -v- The Secretary of Health & Social Care
Junior Counsel representing the Respondent at a two week hearing, where the Claimant alleged she was subjected to a detriment to deter, punish or prevent trade union activity.
Mr A Poznaski -v- Exceed Logistics Limited 2600570/2018
Represented the Claimant who asserted that he had been unfairly dismissed following an allegation of fuel theft. Secured a finding for the Claimant in relation to an unlawful deduction from wages.
Daniel Alden -v- Skinnergate Cycles Stockton Limited 2501655/2018
Successfully represented the Respondent securing the dismissal of the claim as out of time and through failure to comply with Court Orders. Disability also considered.
Clerks
Jenna Chaplin
Call: 2015
Jenna Chaplin
University of Sheffield, LLB Hons 2:1
University of Law, BPTC Very Competent
Middle Temple
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Jenna specialises in Private Children cases and Financial Remedy. Jenna is known for her sensitive client care, her tactful negotiation skills and her robust approach in court. Jenna prides herself on her hard-working nature, thorough preparation and attention to detail.
Jenna has a busy private children practice and has a strong track record for achieving excellent results for parents and wider family members. Jenna is regularly instructed to represent clients in complex private children cases involving serious allegations of child abuse, domestic violence and parental alienation. Jenna appears in disputes regarding domestic and international relocation.
Jenna has a broad range of experience representing both Applicants and Respondents at all stages of financial remedy proceedings including final hearings. Jenna has experience in dealing with cases involving intervenors, wanton dissipation and hidden assets. Jenna is happy to advise in conference and in writing.
Jenna also accepts instructions in regulatory law, having previous experience whilst on secondment with a solicitors firm and subsequently in chambers.
Jenna joined chambers following successful completion of her pupillage under the supervision of Peter Hampton and Matthew Rudd. Prior to completing her pupillage, Jenna worked at a prestigious law firm in London.
Reputation
Jenna has conducted seminars for chambers including recently with Dornier Whittaker on alcohol testing and section 91(14) orders and Semaab Shaikh on guidance for remote hearings.
Expertise
Family
Jenna is a specialist family practitioner, undertaking cases involving private disputes regarding children and financial remedy.Jenna regularly appears in front of both District and Circuit Judges alike.
Jenna’s caseload routinely involves the following areas of private children:
• Applications for shared care/live with orders
• Applications for relocation of the children both domestically and internationally
• Applications for orders preventing the removal of a child from the jurisdiction
• Finding of Fact Hearings involving allegations of child abuse, domestic violence and parental alienation
• Applications for orders determining the child’s schooling
Jenna is regularly instructed at all stages of financial remedy proceedings.
Regulatory
Jenna accepts instructions in regulatory law. Jenna has represented Social Work England at both interim and substantive hearings whilst on secondment with a local solicitor’s firm and subsequently in chambers. Jenna has experience in drafting documents for the Panel’s consideration and advising on the merits of complex cases.
Notable Cases
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/221.html
H v W (2024): Jenna represented the Wife at a Final Hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The Court was persuaded to transfer the family home to the Wife’s name for a payment to the Husband of just £5,000 – with the Wife retaining the entirety of her NHS pension.
R v E (2024): Jenna was instructed to represent the Mother in proceedings concerning international relocation. Findings were made against the Father involving physical assaults, threatening behaviour including with weapons and controlling and coercive behaviour. These findings led to the Father not actively opposing the Mother’s proposed move abroad, which had been endorsed by Cafcass.
N v H (2024): Jenna is instructed to represent the Father in ongoing proceedings relating to his 1 year old son. Serious allegations of sexual violence throughout the relationship were made against the Father in addition to controlling and coercive behaviour. All of the findings sought against the Father were dismissed.
W v H (2023): Jenna was instructed to represent the Mother at a FHDRA. Jenna successfully opposed an application for psychiatric assessment of the Mother, who had been seeing the child on a supervised basis. Jenna successfully applied for unsupervised contact. The proceedings concluded at this hearing with equal shared care.
B v H (2023): Jenna represented the Mother at a Finding of Fact hearing. The Court made multiple findings of rape, after the Father accepted that he had lied on key issues during cross-examination. Jenna made submissions that in light of the facts of the case, the principles in Re H-N & Others [2021] EWCA Civ 448 applied and invited the Court to make a finding that the Father’s rape of the Mother amounted to controlling and coercive behaviour. The Court agreed and made this finding.
N v P (2022): Jenna represented the Father at a 3 day Finding of Fact hearing. Allegations were made against the Father of rape, controlling and coercive behaviour and threatening behaviour in the presence of the child. Further allegations were made that during the course of proceedings the Father had been violent towards the child and had engaged in threatening behaviour towards the child. All findings against the Father of abusive behaviour were dismissed.
S v B (2021): Jenna represented a mother at a Final Hearing in a case where the child lived with his paternal aunt. The Social Worker did not recommend progressing contact. The mother sought for contact to be progressed to include overnight stays. After cross-examination of the Social Worker, the Judge indicated that she would order overnight stays, due to the responses provided by the Social Worker. The parties agreed a stepped order to include overnight stays.
P v S (2021): Jenna represented a mother at a Final Hearing, having represented the mother for over 2 years during lengthy court proceedings. The Social Worker had initially recommended overnight stays for the mother. By the time of the Final Hearing, the recommendation for overnight contact had been revoked due to a change in social worker. Furthermore, in evidence at the Final Hearing the Social Worker said that she was no longer opposing an SGO for maternal grandparents. After contested evidence, the Magistrates concluded that overnight contact was in the child’s best interests and implemented alternative weekend overnight contact in addition to extended periods of school holiday contact. The Magistrates refused to grant the application for a SGO.
Clerks
Ella Embleton
Call: 2019
Ella Embleton
BPP Manchester, BPTC, Very Competent (2019)
BPP Manchester, Legal Practice LLM, Distinction (2019)
Law LLB, 1:1, University of Manchester (2018)
Ann Goddard Scholar
Criminal Bar Association
Grade 2 Prosecutor
RASSO Panel
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 / 0113 246 2600
Ella prosecutes and defends in a range of cases in the Crown Court. She has successfully prosecuted and defended in trials concerning sexual offences, offences against the person and drugs offences.
Reputation
Expertise
Criminal
Ella has experience in representing vulnerable clients who have been considered not fit to plead and stand trial. Ella has represented their interests at trial and secured an absolute discharge for one of her clients at a disposal hearing. Further to this, Ella has recently completed the Vulnerable Witness Training and is now able to conduct s.28 hearings and handle young and vulnerable witnesses.
As a result of her developing practice, Ella has experience in dealing with all stages of POCA proceedings.
In addition to her criminal practice, Ella has represented local councils in relation to matters concerning trading standards. She has also acted for Defendants in such hearings, dealing with closure orders and licence conditions.
Prior to commencing pupillage Ella worked as a paralegal at the General Medical Council, drafting allegations for tribunal hearings and facilitating expert reports. As such Ella has experience and knowledge of medical expert evidence.
Regulatory
Prior to joining the Bar, Ella worked for the General Medical Council in their Fitness to Practice directorate. As such, Ella has experience in interim order tribunals, and contested fitness to practice hearings before the Medical Practitioners Tribunal.
Since joining the Bar, Ella was appointed to the Nursing and Midwifery Council advocates panel and has represented the NMC in interim order hearings. Ella also has experience of representing doctors before the Medical Practitioners Tribunal for interim order hearings.
Ella has a keen interest in coroners court and inquest law, and welcomes instructions in this area too.
Notable Cases
R v T (2024): Represented to act for one of three defendants in a case concerning Production of Cannabis where the defence of modern day slavery was raised. Ella successfully made a submission of no case to answer, which resulted in her clients acquittal.
R v Salisbury (2024): Prosecution of ex-coronation street star and Emmerdale director for one count of sexual communication with a child.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13865825/Emmerdale-director-Harry-Styles-brag-grooming-teenage-boy-avoids-jail.html
R v X (2024): Ella Embleton secured a 2-year community order for her client charged with second offence of Arson (reckless as to whether life was endangered.
https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/24393512.woman-court-horton-park-health-centre-arson/
R v K (2024): Ella represented a client charged with possession with intent to supply Class A. Ella drafted a written an application to dismiss which was successful. This resulted in the case being dismissed.
R v S (2024): Ella represented a client charged with possession with intent to supply cannabis. On the day of trial, Ella successfully negotiated with the Prosecutor which resulted in the Crown offering no evidence.
R v Allinson (2024): Ella represented the Defendant at his sentencing hearing for an attempt s.18, in which the Defendant had run over the Complainant. Ella secured a sentence of 43 months’ imprisonment and a two-year disqualification.
https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/23940898.jailed-pair-said-claimed-ran-consett-arrest/
R v Riaz (2023): Ella represented a client charged with being drunk on an aircraft alongside four other offences. Ella successfully secured a 14 month sentence for her client.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/plane-drunk-abused-air-stewardess-28018934
R v Hussain (2023): Ella represented a client for sentence for two offences of perverting the course of justice and secured a 12 month community order with 100 hours of unpaid work.
R v Naqui (2023): Prosecution of a 3rd strike burglar who received 6 years’ imprisonment.
https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/23954118.bradford-burglar-cruelly-lied-man-dementia/?ref=rss&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
R v Fitzpatrick (2023): Ella acted as junior defence counsel to Rodney Ferm for a client charged with several offences of blackmail and being concerned in the supply of Class A drugs. The Crown originally stated that it was 12 kilograms of cocaine, however after lengthy negotiations it was agreed that 5 kilograms would be a suitable basis on which the Defendant pleaded guilty. As part of this case, Ella considered a significant volume of EncroChat material.
https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/23940898.jailed-pair-said-claimed-ran-consett-arrest/
R v V (2023): Ella recently defended a client charged with Production of Cannabis. On the day of trial, Ella managed to persuade the Crown to offer no evidence in respect of her client due to the lack of evidence that he was involved in the production.
R v K(2023): Ella represented an ex-West Yorkshire Police Detention Officer charged with two offences of impersonating a police officer and a racially aggravated public order offence. After a two-day trial, the Magistrates returned not-guilty verdicts to all charges.
R v S (2023): Ella successfully prosecuted a burglary trial at Leeds Crown Court in which expert evidence relating to glass fragments was adduced and challenged.
R v Hussain (2023): Defence Counsel in a driving whilst disqualified / driving whilst using mobile phone / failing to stop case. The issue was identification. Ella succeeded in a half time submission of ’no case to answer’.
R v S (2023): Ella secured suspended sentence for client charged with perverting the course of justice https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/23330487.teen-crashed-seat-ibiza-fled-scene-reported-stolen/
R v D (2022): Ella secured a conviction in a 3-day robbery trial whereby the issue was ID. The case involved legal arguments concerning the admissibility of evidence.
R v Mobin (2022): Ella successfully prosecuted Zeeshan Mobin for offences of ABH and strangulation after an all-day trial in the magistrates court. The Defendant was committed to the Crown Court for sentence whereby he received 18 months’ imprisonment and was made subject to a 10-year restraining order. Mr Mobin was one of the first Defendants to be tried and sentenced for the new offence of non-fatal strangulation.
https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/23209479.bradford-man-zeeshan-mobin-jailed-throttling-partner/?ref=rss&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
R v P (2022): Ella secured an acquittal for her Defendant charged with Assault ABH after a trial involving three witnesses.
R v B (2022): Ella successfully defended at trial her client charged with ABH.
R v T (2022): Ella secured an acquittal after trial for her client charged with two counts of assault by beating. The case involved complex legal arguments considering res gestae and the admissibility of evidence.
R v Kluka (2022): Secured a suspended sentence order for client charged with dangerous driving who caused an estimated £120,000 worth of damage to a property in Stockport.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/drunk-who-smashed-70k-audi-25343564
R v B (2022): Secured acquittal for client charged with child abduction.
https://www.broadwayhouse.co.uk/news/ella-embleton-successful-defence-abduction
R v Porter (2021): Ella represented the Prosecution in a trial concerning a charge of harassment at York Magistrates Court. Ella was successful and the Defendant was found guilty.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/horse-carrots-restraining-order-nelson-b1960884.html
Clerks
Lauren Smith
Call: 2019
Lauren Smith
University of York – LLB – First Class Honours [2015]
University of York – LLM in Legal and Political Theory – Distinction [2017]
BPP Leeds – BPTC (Part-time) – Outstanding [2017-2019]
University of York – York Masters Opportunity Scholarship [2017]
Middle Temple – Harmsworth Scholarship [2017]
Blackstone Entrance Exhibition [2017]
Certificate of Honour [2019]
BPP – Criminal Litigation Prize (for highest mark on Criminal Litigation module) [2019]
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 / 0113 246 2600
Lauren completed her pupillage at Broadway House Chambers under the supervision of Peter Hampton (now HHJ Hampton). Lauren started tenancy on 1st September 2022.
Lauren has experience of cases involving driving offences, sexual offences, offences against the person, theft offences and drug offences. She has appeared before criminal courts up to and including the Court of Appeal.
Lauren is a Grade 2 Prosecutor.
Expertise
Prior to commencing pupillage, Lauren worked as a paralegal in the regulatory department at Capsticks Solicitors. On behalf of Social Work England, Lauren assisted with drafting applications to the High Court for Interim Order Extensions and investigating fitness to practise concerns by interviewing witnesses. Lauren was also responsible for preparing cases for final and interim hearings, for example by identifying material for disclosure. As such, Lauren has experience and knowledge of professional discipline, and is keen to develop a practice in regulatory law.
Lauren now has a developing regulatory practice. She has provided written advice to regulatory bodies on fitness to practice proceedings and has represented a Registrant before a professional disciplinary tribunal. She is keen to develop her practice further by undertaking work for regulatory bodies (including public authorities) and Registrants subject to professional disciplinary proceedings. Lauren welcomes instructions in inquest work.
Whilst studying for the BPTC, Lauren undertook pro-bono work for the Criminal Appeals Project, AMICUS ALJ and Support Through Court at Leeds Combined Court Centre. Consequently, Lauren has experience of working alongside litigants in person and vulnerable clients, such as those with mental health difficulties or victims of domestic violence.
Lauren is a Grade 2 Prosecutor.
Notable Cases
R v H [2024] Bradford Crown Court: Defence of H, who was charged with ABH and two counts of intentional strangulation. Following a 4-day trial, H was unanimously acquitted.
R v M [2024] Newcastle Crown Court: Led Junior for the defence of M, who was charged as a co-conspirator in six offences including conveying prohibited articles into prison. Case resolved with a plea to one lesser alternative offence.
R v C [2024] Bradford Crown Court: Defence of C, who pleaded guilty to fraud by abuse of position (value £112,000). Lauren secured a suspended sentence order.
R v H [2024] Bradford Crown Court: Currently instructed by the prosecution as led junior in a fraud, where the alleged losses total more than £3,000,000.
R v X [2023] Bradford Magistrates Court: Lauren secured acquittal for client charged with causing death by careless driving.
W v R [2023] Court of Appeal: Defence of W, who had pleaded guilty to an offence of stalking causing fear of violence. Lauren advised that the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive. She then successfully appeared before the Court of Appeal, who substituted the sentence of 27 months' imprisonment for one of 16 months. This meant the appellant had served his sentence and was immediately released.
R v B [2023] Leeds Youth Court: Defence of B, a 14-year-old, who was convicted of various offences including robbery, ABH and assaulting emergency workers. He was assisted by an intermediary. Following mitigation, the Magistrates sentenced B to a Referral Order.
R v L [2023] Carlisle Crown Court: Defending a Vietnamese asylum seeker who faced a count of possession with intent to supply Class B drugs. Drugs valued at £130,000.
R v P [2023] York Crown Court: Defence of P at sentence, who had pleaded guilty to two counts of possession of class A drugs with intent to supply and possession of an offensive weapon. Lauren secured a suspended sentence order.
R v P [2023] Bradford Crown Court: Defence of P at sentence, who had been convicted of possession with intent to supply class B drugs after trial. Lauren secured a suspended sentence order.
R v M [2022] Bradford Crown Court: Defending one of the first defendants to be sentenced in Bradford for the new offence of intentional non-fatal strangulation.
R v L [2023] Bradford Crown Court: Defending L, who had pleaded guilty on the day of trial to s.20 GBH, having struck V to the back of the head with a hammer. Lauren secured a suspended sentence order.
R v W [2023] Bradford Crown Court: Prosecution of a defendant who is due to stand trial for numerous offences committed in the domestic context. The case involves two child witnesses who are eligible for s.28 cross-examination.
R v C [2022] Leeds Magistrates' Court: Prosecution of a defendant charged with ABH in the domestic context. The complainant had retracted their support for the prosecution and did not attend trial. Lauren made a successful res gestae application to rely on the complainant's initial account. The defendant was convicted.
R v B, C and H [2023] Sheffield Crown Court: Prosecution of a multi-handed robbery trial with 3 defendants.
R v B [2023] Leeds Crown Court:Prosecution of a defendant charged with burglary. The case involved presentation of expert evidence (fingerprint, blood and cell site). The defendant was convicted.
R v B [2023] Bradford Crown Court: Defending B at sentence, who had pleaded guilty to two knifepoint robberies, with relevant previous convictions. The sentencing guidelines gave a starting point of 5 years and suggested consecutive sentences were appropriate. Following mitigation, the Judge imposed two concurrent sentences of 4 years.
R v W [2023] Harrogate Magistrates' Court: Defending W at sentence, who had been convicted of an offence of domestic burglary after trial. The sentencing guidelines gave a starting point of 6 months imprisonment, but Lauren persuaded the Bench to impose a 12-month community order.
R v W [2023] Nottingham Crown Court: Defence of W at sentence, who had pleaded guilty to numerous offences including robbery, arson and dangerous driving. The defendant had relevant previous convictions. The sentencing guidelines gave a starting point of 13 years. Following mitigation, a total sentence of 10 years, 6 months was imposed.
R v W [2023] Leeds Youth Court: Defended W, a 14-year-old, who pleaded guilty to two counts of robbery, two counts of possessing an imitation firearm, possession of a bladed article and handling stolen goods. The prosecution asked for W to be committed to sentence to the Crown Court. Following mitigation, the Magistrates declined to commit the offence and imposed a Youth Rehabilitation Order.
Clerks
Danny Smith
Call: 2023 (Solicitor 2016)
Danny Smith
University of Leicester, Postgraduate Diploma in Employment Law, Distinction (2023)
Solicitor-Advocate, Higher Rights of Audience (Civil) (2021)
University of Sheffield, Postgraduate Diploma in Legal Practice (2010)
Cardiff University, LLB Law (2009)
Middle Temple
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 / 0113 246 2600
Danny Smith joined Broadway House Chambers in October 2023 and accepts instructions within all elements of employment law, commercial law, property/landlord and tenant law, professional discipline, licencing, regulatory and sports law.
Having been admitted as a solicitor in 2016, Danny possesses prior experience within these areas before transitioning to the Bar. Consequently, he is well-versed in working with lay clients beyond the confines of the courtroom, prioritising excellent client care.
Danny has extensive experience dealing with all matters of employment law. Before joining Broadway House Chambers, Danny was employed as a solicitor advocate at a litigation firm in Leeds dealing exclusively with employment law litigation matters. He has experience of drafting complicated statements of case and carrying out advocacy at the employment tribunal including at both preliminary hearing and multi-day final hearings.
Danny also has experience of advising and undertaking advocacy for commercial law and property/landlord & tenant matters after being employed as a property litigation solicitor at a large commercial firm in Leeds and a housing law paralegal at a national housing charity. He is well equipped to assist with the full range of commercial law and property law matters.
“Danny is a tenacious advocate with a real attention to detail. He grasps complex matters quickly and with alacrity. His pragmatic and down-to-earth style puts clients at ease. I have no trouble whatsoever in recommending him” - Toby Pochron, Director, Freeths
Reputation
“Danny is a tenacious advocate with a real attention to detail. He grasps complex matters quickly and with alacrity. His pragmatic and down-to-earth style puts clients at ease. I have no trouble whatsoever in recommending him” - Toby Pochron, Director, Freeths.
"Danny is an expert in his field and helped us acheive a settlement in a disability discriminatio case that we thought would be impossible to settle. I would not hesitate to recommend him" Solicitor Feedback, 2024.
With previous experience as a solicitor, Danny has vast experience working within Employment Law, Commercial Law and matters involving Property & Landlord & Tenant.
Expertise
Danny accepts instructions for Claimants and Respondents at all stages in employment tribunal proceedings.
As a Solicitor Advocate, he has dealt with numerous cases involving:
- Discrimination
- Whistleblowing
- Unfair Dismissal
- Wrongful Dismissal
- Working Time Directive
- Unlawful Deductions and Breach of Contract
Danny has experience and is able to represent at all hearings at the employment tribunal. He has appeared at both multi day hearings and at preliminary hearings to determine disability, time limits, employment status, specific disclosure and strike out/deposit orders.
Property & Landlord & Tenant
Danny accepts instructions for both Claimants and Defendants.
As a Solicitor he advised and acted:
- Possession, Disrepair and Deposit Protection
- Trespass & Unlawful Occupation
- Lease Renewals and Break Notices
- Telecoms
- Dilapidations
- Rights of Way and Boundary Disputes
- Service Charge Disputes
- Party Wall Disputes
- Adverse Possession
- Forfeiture
Commercial Law
Danny accepts instructions for both Claimants and Defendants. As a solicitor, Danny advised and acted on breach of contract claims, debt recovery and employment law related disputes such as breach of restrictive covenants.
Professional Discipline & Licensing
Danny has extensive experience of sensitively advising and robustly representing regulated professionals before tribunals. Together with his employment law experience, Danny can be instructed from an early stage to include and ensure clients are easily navigated from the intertwining complexities of regulatory and employment law.
Healthcare Regulatory
Danny is regularly instructed to advise and represent care home clients and has a deep understanding of the unique regulated industry.
Danny is also interested in inquests.
Notable Cases
Acting for a group company and its remaining associative companies as a result of one of the associated companies being liquidated resulting in all staff being dismissed by way of redundancy. A former director and employee of the liquidated company brought an unfair dismissal claim against the remaining associated companies arguing that they was employed by them.
(2023)
Acting for a Respondent obtaining a strike out due to time limits.
(2022 -2023)
Advising care homes in relation to compulsory Covid 19 vaccination and mask wearing policies and defending claims brought against it as a result of action taken under the policy.
G -v- H Limited, Leeds ET (2022)
2 day disability discrimination and constructive unfair dismissal claim brought by a former employee due to alleged “pressure” by the Respondent. Danny successfully represented the Respondent.
E -v- L Limited, Manchester ET (2021)
Unlawful deduction and breach of contract claim brought by a former employee due to a mistake in the Claimant’s contract of employment. Danny successfully represented the Respondent.
Clerks
Camilla Bonifai
Call: 2019
Camilla Bonifai
LLB (Hons) English Law, University of Dundee (2017)
LLM Human Rights Law, University of Edinburgh (2018)
LLM Bar Practice, The University of Law (2019)
Bar Practice Training Course, The University of Law, Very Competent (2019)
Employment Lawyers Association
Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association
Lincoln’s Inn
Contact
E: clerks@broadwayhouse.co.uk
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600 (Option 2)
Camilla commenced pupillage in September 2023 under the supervision of Paul Smith and has since gained further experience in different areas of Civil, Employment, Immigration and Regulatory Law. Camilla started her tenancy as a Barrister at Broadway House in September 2024.
Camilla is on Panel for the Government Legal Department’s Junior Junior Scheme. Camilla accepts Employment, Immigration and Civil instructions.
Prior to pupillage, Camilla had a civil litigation background, having worked in the civil courts as a County Court advocate (employed by an international firm) and having handled Claimant insurer-funded cases as a paralegal at a national solicitors’ firm.
Reputation
Publication: ‘The Irish Children’s Right Referendum’ (2019), published by Together (Scottish alliance for Children’s Rights)
Expertise
Employment
Camilla has observed a variety of employment matters during the first six months of her pupillage by attending Employment Tribunals across the country and in the EAT. Since the start of her second six months of her pupillage, Camilla has represented clients in preliminary and final hearings in matters involving all aspects of Employment Law. Camilla also has an extensive paper practice and accepts instructions to draft pleadings and provide written opinions.
Immigration
Camilla has represented clients in the First Tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal. She has been involved in factually complex cases regarding the situations in Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, Ethiopia, Eritrea and Vietnam as well as those involving EU settled status, and children. Camilla has also advised on matters of unlawful detention.
Civil
Camilla is instructed in a wide variety of Civil matters, representing and advising both Claimants and Defendants.Business, Commercial and Property – Camilla is regularly instructed to deal with matters involving commercial and residential property, housing disrepair, landlord and tenant matters, TOLATA, contract disputes, aviation, credit hire and debt recovery. Camilla regularly appears in the civil courts for applications, case management hearings, small and fast track trials.
Personal Injury – Camilla has developed considerable experience in dealing with Personal Injury matters, having worked as a personal injury paralegal and advocate prior to commencing pupillage. Camilla has been instructed to appear in the County Courts for both Claimants and Defendants on several cases. Camilla has also experience in advising on quantum on complex injury and high value matters.
Regulatory
Camilla has experience in disciplinary work and sport regulatory work.
Camilla has an extensive employment practice in which she is regularly instructed on disciplinary cases to represent a number of professionals. Camilla appears in the Tribunal regularly and advises on a number of matters involving healthcare professionals such as nurses, healthcare assistants and care workers. Camilla has also represented professional athletes and has carried out extensive work and attended hearings on historic cases before the Sport Resolutions appointed disciplinary and safeguarding panels.
Camilla has appeared in the Coroner’s Court, as well as advised and assisted colleagues on a number of inquests both on behalf of bereaved families and other corporate entities. Camilla draws on her civil practice to be well-equipped to advise and represent interested persons in cases that may follow after the inquest.
Camilla has interest in the following areas:
• Professional discipline
• Healthcare Regulatory
• Licensing
• Inquests
Clerks
Shebanee Devadasan
Second Six Pupil | Call: 2023
Shebanee Devadasan
Durham University, LLB (Hons) Law, 2:1 (2021)
Geneva Academy, LLM International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, Magna Cum Laude (2022)
Northumbria University, LLM Law, Distinction (2023)
Northumbria University, Bar Course, Distinction (2023)
Middle Temple Jules Thorn Scholar
Criminal Bar Association
Grade 1 Prosecutor
Contact
E: clerks@broadwayhouse.co.uk
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Shebanee has a criminal practice and accepts instructions in this area, both in prosecution and defence.
Shebanee commenced pupillage at Broadway House Chambers in September 2024 under the supervision of Rebecca Young.
During pupillage, Shebanee observed a range of cases in the Crown Court involving murder, encouraging suicide, serious sexual offences, drug offences, burglary, and offences against the person. She also observed hearings at the Magistrates’ Court and Youth Court.
During her first six, Shebanee helped her supervisor prepare for various, serious sexual, drug, and violence cases. Notably, Shebanee went through hundreds of unused materials, amended indictments, summarised VRIs, drafted sentence mitigations and drafted case openings.
Reputation
Environmental Destruction and Armed Conflict: Protecting the Vulnerable Through Islamic Law (2022) Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice
Disaster Recovery in Indonesia: A Legal and Policy Survey (2022) International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
Malaysia’s Race-Based Policies: Utilitarian or Divisive? (2020) Durham Asian Law Journal
Expertise
Crime
Prior to commencing pupillage, Shebanee worked as a paralegal in a Personal Injury Firm in the UK. She regularly reviewed medical and engineer reports, extracting the necessary information in order to negotiate settlements in her clients’ favour. In Malaysia, Shebanee worked with asylum seekers who were victims of crimes within detention centres, demonstrating her ability to work with vulnerable individuals.
Shebanee is fluent in Bahasa Malaysia, and has a working knowledge of Bahasa Indonesia. As such, she can sensitively communicate with, and explain complex information in a digestible way to, those whose first language is not English.
Shebanee has a particular interest in Human Rights Law. Her LLM degrees and academic research demonstrate that she would be excellent at dealing with criminal cases involving Human Rights issues and would welcome instructions in such matters.
Shebanee has written research reports for international organisations, acted as an editor for legal journals, and peer-reviewed articles for academic journals. As such, she can confidently carry out legal research in short periods of time and produce written work of a high quality.
Regulatory
In addition to her criminal practice, Shebanee has an interest in military inquests, as well as healthcare and environmental regulatory work. Her Masters provided her with an in-depth understanding of the laws of armed conflict. She has also carried out legal research for, and published articles on environmental protection laws.
Clerks
Jamie Hill KC
Door Tenant - Call: 1984 | Silk: 2006
Jamie Hill KC (Door Tenant)
Recorder: 2002
Inner Temple
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
With his extensive experience in all aspects of criminal law Jamie is the Silk of choice for many defence solicitors when seeking leading counsel for clients charged with serious offences, including murder, manslaughter, sexual abuse, kidnap, rape and fraud.
Reputation
Jamie Hill KC is noted for his 'ability to hold his nerve and provide strong leadership in distressing cases. He handles high-profile and serious criminal matters, such as manslaughter, rape and drugs cases. He acts for both the defence and the prosecution' (Chambers & Partners, 2022)
Expertise
Crime an Regulatory
He has particular expertise in medical and scientific issues, with recent experience of non-accidental head injuries in babies, and involvement in a leading case in the interpretation of LCN DNA evidence.
He also has considerable experience in employment and regulatory matters, particularly involving issues of Discrimination, Health and Safety issues. He has regularly represented the Police Federation over the last 25 years both as a Q.C. and Junior in relation to Police Disciplinary Hearings and Inquests. He has also advised several high ranking officers in relation to employment matters.
In addition Jamie has also advised a group of BME officers in Cleveland regarding discrimination claims which were settled as well as local hotel chain in relation to a serious fire safety case.
Wide experience of prosecuting and defending. Also has considerable experience of Police Disciplinary work and civil actions against the Police.
Notable Cases
R -v- F (Large scale drug dealing and rape to enforce drug debts, major issues of PII and role of informers)
R -v- Reed (Gangland killing – case based on LCN DNA interpretation)
R -v- Harrobin (Prosecution of historic sexual abuse)
R -v- Curtis & Others (Murder involving teenage knife crime)
R -v- Hodgson (Murder – 6 week missing body case. Appeal pending re prosecution use of forensic linguist to interpret text messages)
R -v- Jewell (Baby shaking murder reduced to manslaughter)
R -v- Vinter (Prosecution of murder – whole life order)
Clerks